This comparison isn’t for the sake of criticism — it’s a compass.
In a world full of digital projects that promise “revolutions” and “profits” without philosophy or responsibility, this is an attempt to show the difference between simulated engagement and real contribution.

Comparison Table

Criteria	Pi Network	HUMAS System
Mining	Tapping a button once a day in the app	Not used. Energy is measured as personal contribution
Technological Base	Closed network, no access to blockchain	Open architecture, validation through meaningful actions
Project Purpose	Mass adoption through referral circles	New economy structure based on human energy
Philosophy	None. App-based gamification	Humanism, personal responsibility, digital reflection of meaning
Token	Pi. Not traded, no market value	HUMAScoin. Linked to HUNIT (human energy unit)
Participation Model	Clicking and inviting others	Contribution through conscious actions and energy trace
Transparency	No smart contracts, no audits	Algorithms are open, concept is public
Time to Launch	Since 2019, full launch still pending	HUMAS System already operates as a prototype and vision
Human Energy Framework	None. Human energy not addressed	Energy is the foundation: measured, acknowledged, converted
Promotion Strategy	Aggressive MLM model, hundreds of social groups	Subtle emergence through text, visuals, and dialogue

Comment
Pi Network is a promise.
HUMAS System is a structure.

The first relies on waiting.
The second on awakening and action.

There’s no conflict — only a choice:
To be inside a system that imitates value, or inside one that actually creates it.